Assignments for lesson "Cultural Mediation & the Interpreter Role"
| Assignment title and description | Solutions | Notes / Feedback |
|---|---|---|
Role Boundary DrillActivity 3: Role Boundary DrillType: Decision-Making Exercise · Estimated time: 20 minutes · Submission: Text field or uploaded document (Download Word Template: Assignment3_RoleBoundaryDrillFor each situation below, choose the correct action and explain your reasoning. Use the three-part protocol from the lesson when appropriate: render, alert, explain in third person. Your choices for each situation: • A. Render as-is and continue • B. Render the statement, then alert the court to a translation challenge • C. Request a brief pause to resolve the issue before rendering Situation 1 A witness uses a term that could mean either “order” (as in a command) or “errand” (as in a task to complete) depending on regional usage. The distinction is legally material because the case turns on whether the defendant was given a command or asked to perform a task voluntarily. Your choice (A, B, or C) and reasoning for Situation 1: Situation 2 A defendant uses a highly formal term of address toward the judge that is standard and respectful in their home country’s legal tradition. Rendered literally into English, the phrase sounds oddly elaborate — and in context, the interpreter fears it might read as sarcastic or mocking. Your choice (A, B, or C) and reasoning for Situation 2: Situation 3 A child witness uses a colloquial, regionalized term for a body part that has no standard clinical equivalent in English. The term is not obscene in the source culture; it is the word a child of that background would naturally use. An approximate clinical term exists in English but does not carry the same register. Your choice (A, B, or C) and reasoning for Situation 3: Situation 4 A party explains that they visited a curandera before a medical procedure, framing it as a normal part of their healthcare routine. The attorney questioning them appears to be treating this as evidence of mental instability or non-compliance with medical advice. The interpreter believes the attorney is misreading a culturally normative practice. Your choice (A, B, or C) and reasoning for Situation 4: Reflection: Was there a situation where your instinct was to intervene more than your professional role permits? Describe what you noticed. Reflection response: |
None yet. |
None yet. |

